TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒ 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ 


(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12under §240.14a-12
INGLES MARKETS, INCORPORATED
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):
No fee required.
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 ☐
Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)Total fee paid:
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1)Amount Previously Paid:
2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3)Filing Party:
4)Date Filed:



TABLE OF CONTENTS

graphic

INGLES MARKETS, INCORPORATED


P.O. BOX 6676


ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28816

NOTICE OF 20222024 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS


TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2022

13, 2024

To the Stockholders of Ingles Markets, Incorporated:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Ingles Markets, Incorporated (the “Company”) will hold its 20222024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) at the Grove Park Inn, 290 Macon Avenue, Asheville, North Carolina 28804 on Tuesday, February 15, 2022,13, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. local time,Eastern Time, for the following purposes:

1.
To elect seveneight directors to serve until the 20232025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; and

2.
To consider and vote on a non-binding approval of the Company’s compensation for named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement;

3.To consider and vote on an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended, that would revise and update the provision on permitted transfers to permit the transfer of Class B Common Stock by a holder thereof to any corporation, limited liability company, partnership or other entity that is controlled by (a) the transferor, (b) an Immediate Family Member of the transferor, or (c) any one or more persons or entities that are each (w) a holder of Class B Common Stock on the date of transfer, or (x) an Immediate Family Member of a holder of Class B Common Stock on the date of transfer, or (z) a descendant of Robert P. Ingle;

4.To vote on a stockholder proposal regarding equal voting rights, if properly presented at the meeting; and

5.
To vote on a stockholder proposal regarding cage free egg progress disclosure, if properly presented at the meeting.Annual Meeting;

4.
To vote on a stockholder proposal concerning risk disclosure related to consumer expectations on significant policy matters, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and
5.
To consider any other business that is properly presented at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The foregoing proposals and other matters relating to the Annual Meeting are described in the Proxy Statement that accompanies this Notice.

Only stockholders of record of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, $0.05 par value per share, and Class B Common Stock, $0.05 par value per share, at the close of business on December 17, 2021,15, 2023, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. We will make available at the Company’s corporate offices a list of stockholders as of the close of business on December 17, 2021,15, 2023, for inspection during normal business hours during the ten-day period immediately preceding the Annual Meeting.

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, orreferred to as the E-proxy notice, on or about January 6, 20224, 2024, to our stockholders of record on December 17, 2021.15, 2023. The E-proxy notice contains instructions for your use of this process, including how to access our proxy statementProxy Statement and annual report2023 Annual Report and how to authorize your proxy to vote online.vote. In addition, the E-proxy notice contains instructions on how you may receive a paper copy of the proxy statementProxy Statement and annual report2023 Annual Report or elect to receive your proxy statementProxy Statement and annual report2023 Annual Report over the Internet.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote by proxy as soon as possible over the Internet as instructed in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or E-proxy notice, or, if you receive paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you can also vote by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card. If you are a holder of record of common stock, you may also cast your votes in person at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in “street name” (that is, held for your account by a broker or other nominee), you will receive instructions from your broker or other nominee as to how to vote your shares.

shares.
By Order of the Board of Directors
graphic
Robert P. Ingle, II

Chairman of the Board
Asheville, North Carolina
January 6, 2022

Asheville, North Carolina
January 4, 2024
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.



PLEASE VOTE OVER THE INTERNET AS INSTRUCTED IN THESE MATERIALS OR COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN A PROXY CARD AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
2
4
4
6
7
7
7
8
8
9
10
10
11
12
13
14
15
20
21
21
22
22
22
22
PROPOSAL TO AMEND ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION24
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ON EQUAL VOTING RIGHTS FOR EACH SHARE25
27
29
29
29
29
29
29
30

-i-i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INGLES MARKETS, INCORPORATED


P. O. BOX 6676


ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28816



ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING


FEBRUARY 15, 2022

13, 2024

Grove Park Inn


290 Macon Avenue


Asheville, North Carolina 28804

PROXY STATEMENT

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Ingles Markets, Incorporated (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our” or “Ingles Markets”) furnishes you with this Proxy Statement to solicit proxies to be voted at the 20222024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company.Company (the “Annual Meeting”). The meetingAnnual Meeting will be held at the Grove Park Inn, 290 Macon Avenue, Asheville, North Carolina, on Tuesday, February 15, 2022,13, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. local time,Eastern Time, for the purposes set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders that accompanies this Proxy Statement. The proxies also may be voted at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting. Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which is referred to herein as the(the “E-proxy notice,”notice”), on or about January 6, 20224, 2024, to each holder of record of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, $0.05 par value per share (“Class A Common Stock”) and Class B Common Stock, $0.05 par value per share (“Class B Common Stock”), as of December 17, 2021,15, 2023, the record date for the meeting (the “Record Date”). Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock are sometimes referred to collectively in this Proxy Statement as “Common Stock.” The E-proxy notice and this proxy statementProxy Statement summarize the information you need to know to vote by proxy or in person at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. You do not need to attend the annual meetingAnnual Meeting in person in order to vote.

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 2913 U.S. Highway 70 West, Asheville (Black Mountain), North Carolina 28711. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying forms of proxy are first being provided to stockholders on or about January 6, 2022.

4, 2024.

Execution and Revocation of Proxies

Shares of Common Stock properly voted by proxy as instructed in this Proxy Statement and in the E-proxy notice will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions on the proxy. Proxies that are not properly executed or are not received by the Secretary at or before the Annual Meeting will not be effective.

A stockholder can revoke a proxy at any time prior to the exercise of the authority granted under that proxy. A proxy may be revoked by a stockholder in any of the following ways:

by attending the Annual Meeting and voting the shares covered by the original proxy in person at the Annual Meeting;

by delivering to the Secretary an instrument revoking the proxy prior to the Annual Meeting; or

by delivering a later-dated, properly executed proxy with respect to shares covered by the original proxy prior to the Annual Meeting.

1

by attending the Annual Meeting and voting the shares covered by the original proxy in person at the Annual Meeting;
by delivering to the Secretary an instrument revoking the proxy prior to the Annual Meeting; or

by delivering a later-dated, properly executed proxy with respect to shares covered by the original proxy prior to the Annual Meeting.
Actions to Be Taken by Proxy

If any stockholder fails to provide instructions on a proxy properly submitted via the Internet or mail, its proxy will be voted, as recommended by the Board, of Directors, at the Annual Meeting:

FOR” FORthe election of each of the Board nominees named under the heading ELECTION OF DIRECTORS – Identification of Directors and Executive Officers”Officers;

FOR” FORManagement’s proposal under the heading EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION – Proposal for Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation”Compensation;

FOR” Management’s proposal under the heading “PROPOSAL TO AMEND ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION”;

“AGAINST” AGAINSTthe stockholder proposal under the heading STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ON EQUAL VOTING RIGHTS FOR EACH SHARE”;

“AGAINST” the stockholder proposal under the heading STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING CAGE FREE EGG PROGRESS DISCLOSURE”.DISCLOSURE”; and
AGAINST” the stockholder proposal under the heading “STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL CONCERNING RISK DISCLOSURE RELATED TO CONSUMER EXPECTATIONS ON SIGNIFICANT POLICY MATTERS”.
1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Company’s management knows of no other matter to be brought before the Annual Meeting. Should any other matter properly come before the Annual Meeting, all shares of Common Stock represented by effective proxies will be voted, at their discretion, by the persons acting under such proxies.

Voting Rights

Only holders of record of shares of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to vote at the meetingAnnual Meeting or adjournments or postponements of the meeting.Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 14,296,23514,532,275 shares of Class A Common Stock and 4,698,1414,462,101 shares of Class B Common Stock issued and outstanding.

Quorum Requirements. Each share of Class A Common Stock entitles its holder to one vote per share, and each share of Class B Common Stock entitles its holder to ten votes per share, in each case with respect to any matter properly submitted to a vote of such holders. The presence in person or by proxy of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock constitutes a quorum for purposes of the election of directors by the holders of Class A Common Stock. The presence in person or by proxy of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock constitutes a quorum for purposes of the election of directors by the holders of Class B Common Stock. The presence in person or by proxy of holders of common stockCommon Stock possessing a majority of the aggregate votes represented by the Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, taken together, constitutes a quorum for purposes of all other matters that are properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes. Abstentions with respect to a proposal and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of establishing a quorum.quorum, but they will not be counted as votes cast for or against any proposal, and they will not have any effect on the outcome of any proposal. A broker non-vote occurs if a broker or other financial intermediary does not receive instructions from the beneficial owner of shares held in street name for certain types of proposals, and the broker indicates it does not have authority to vote the shares for such shares.proposals. A broker is entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on “routine” matters without instructions from the beneficial owner of those shares. On the other hand, absent instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, a broker is not entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on “non-routine” matters. All fivefour proposals described in this Proxy Statement constitute “non-routine” matters; therefore, if you hold your shares of Common Stock in street name, and you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote, then your shares will not be voted at the Annual Meeting with respect to the fivefour proposals described in this Proxy Statement. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast for or against any proposal, and they will not have any effect on the outcome of any proposal.

2

Election of Directors. If a quorum of each class is present at the Annual Meeting, the holders of Class A Common Stock, voting as a class, will elect two directors, and the holders of Class B Common Stock, voting as a class, will elect six directors. For purposes of the election of directors, each stockholder will have one vote for each share of Common Stock held by the stockholder as of the Record Date. Pursuant to the North Carolina Business Corporation Act, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote in the election. Thus, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be included in vote totals and will not affect the outcome of the vote.

In accordance with New York Stock Exchange rules, a

A broker that is a member firm of that exchange does not have authority to vote shares held by it in “street name” in the election of directors unless it is instructed by the beneficial owner of such shares as to how such shares are to be voted in such election. Accordingly, if you hold your shares through a broker, you are urged to provide it voting instructions in accordance with your broker’s directions.

Cumulative voting is not applicable to the election of directors at the Annual Meeting.

Other Matters. Unless otherwise provided in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or the North Carolina Business Corporation Act, holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock will vote as a single class with respect to any matter.matter properly brought before our stockholders. In any such vote, stockholders will be entitled to one vote for each share of Class A Common Stock held as of the Record Date and ten votes for each share of Class B Common Stock held as of the Record Date. For purposes of any such vote, if a quorum is present, a proposal will pass if the votes cast “for” the action exceed the votes cast “against” the action, unless otherwise provided in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or the North Carolina Business Corporation Act. Shares not voted with respect to any such matters (whether by abstention or broker non-vote) would not be included in vote totals and would not impact the vote.

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Company knows of no matters other than those listed on the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting.

32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Each member of the Board is elected for a term of one year and until his/his or her successor is elected and qualified or until his/his or her earlier death, resignation, or removal from office. The Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that the Board may from time to timetime-to-time fix by resolution the number of directors that constitutes the Board, which shall be not less than five nor more than eleven. The Board has determined by resolution that the number of directors will be fixed at eight for purposes of this election; however, because Mr. Ronald B. Freeman has notified the Company of his retirement and his determination not to stand for reelection, only seven directors will stand for election at the Annual Meeting.election. In accordance with the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, two of the eight directors will be elected by a vote of the holders of the Class A Common Stock, voting as a separate class, and the remaining fivesix directors will be elected by a vote of the holders of the Class B Common Stock, voting as a separate class.

Identification of Directors and Executive Officers

The Board has nominated, and recommends a vote FOR, Ernest E. Ferguson and John R. Lowden as directors to be elected by the holders of the Class A Common Stock and Fred D. Ayers, Robert P. Ingle, II, Patricia E. Jackson, James W. Lanning, Laura Ingle Sharp, and Brenda S. Tudor as directors to be elected by the holders of the Class B Common Stock.

Proxies received by the Board will be voted “ForFOR” the election of all of the nominees unless stockholders specify a contrary choice in their proxy. We expect each director nominee to be able to serve if elected. If any director nominee is not able to serve, proxies will be voted “for” the remainder of those nominated and may be voted for substitute nominees. Mr. Ronald B. Freeman, a director of the Company since 2005, will not stand for re-election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. The Company thanks Mr. Freeman for his years of service.

The biographical information set forth below was furnished by each named director and executive officer of the Company. Except as otherwise indicated, each such person has been engaged in his or her most recent occupation or employment for more than five years.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Robert P. Ingle, II
Robert P. Ingle, II has been a member of the Board of Directors since February 1997, has served as Chairman of the Board since May 2004, and served as Chief Executive Officer from March 2011 until March 2016. He has been employed by the Company in a variety of positions since 1985. Mr. Ingle brings many years of grocery industry experience to the Board. Mr. Ingle is 53.55.
James W. Lanning
Mr. Lanning has served as a director of the Company since May 2003 and was appointed Chief Executive Officer in March 2016. He has served as President since March 2003. He has been employed by the Company in a variety of positions since 1975. Mr. Lanning brings leadership development skills and many years of grocery industry experience to the Board. Mr. Lanning is 62.64.
Fred D. Ayers
Mr. Ayers has served as a director of the Company since February 2006. Mr. Ayers retired in 2002 as a senior officer of Wachovia Bank.Bank (now Wells Fargo). He has served on numerous boards and remains active in the Asheville community. Mr. Ayers brings many years of auditing, accounting, and finance experience to the Board. Mr. Ayers is 79.81.

4

 Ronald B. Freeman
 Mr. Freeman
Patricia E. Jackson
Ms. Jackson has notifiedserved as a director of the Company of his retirement,since March 2022 and his term as Director will cease at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting, and his rolewas appointed as Chief Financial Officer will cease onof the Company in February 16, 2022.
Ms. Jackson is a certified public accountant. She previously served as the Company’s Controller from 2010 to February 2022. Ms. Jackson brings considerable auditing, accounting, and finance experience to the Board. Ms. Jackson is 59.
3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Ernest E. Ferguson
Mr. Ferguson has served as a director of the Company since December 2014. Mr. Ferguson retired in 2007 as a senior vice president and commercial sales director of Wachovia Bank (now Wells Fargo). He has continued to serve on numerous boards and remains active in the Asheville community. Mr. Ferguson brings auditing, accounting, and finance experience to the Board. Mr. Ferguson is 74.76.
John R. Lowden
Mr. Lowden has served as a director of the Company since April 2018. Mr. Lowden is President and Chief Investment Officer of NewCastle Partners, LLC, a private investment firm founded in 2001. Mr. Lowden brings finance skills as well as investing knowledge to the Board. Mr. Lowden is 64.66.
Laura Ingle Sharp
Ms. Sharp has been a director of the Company since February 1997. She has in the past served the Company in several capacities on a full-time and part-time basis. The Company’s “Laura Lynn” private label products are named after Ms. Sharp.Sharp has been an associate or Director of the Company, or its subsidiaries for many years, and as such is qualified to serve on the Board. Ms. Sharp is 64.66.

Brenda S. Tudor

Ms. Tudor has served as a director of the Company since December 2014. Ms. Tudor is a certified public accountant. She retired May 31, 2019, as President and Chief Financial Officer of Morgan-Keefe Builders, Inc., a role she held since 2006. Ms. Tudor brings auditing, accounting, and finance skills as well as knowledge of the grocery industry to the Board. Ms. Tudor is 64.66.
Michael David Hogan
Mr. Hogan has served as President of the Company’s subsidiary, Milkco, since October 1, 2022. Mr. Hogan has served as Plant Operations Manager in the Dairy industry since 2014, serving in that capacity with Milkco since 2019. Mr. Hogan is 41.

Messrs. Ingle and Lanning, and Ms. Sharp have been associates and/or directors of the Company, or its subsidiaries, for many years and, as such, are uniquely qualified to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors. Messrs. Ayers, Lowden, and Ferguson, and Ms. Tudor provide unique and diverse qualities to our Board of Directors as a result of their backgrounds as senior banking officers, chief investment officer, and corporate executive officer, respectively. The Board currently consists of six white males and two white females.

Robert P. Ingle, II and Laura Ingle Sharp are brother and sister. There are no other family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of the Company. Based upon the voting power of Mr. Robert P. Ingle, II, the majority holder of the outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock in the election of directors, the Company meets the definition of a “Controlled Company” for purposes of the Nasdaq corporate governance rules. Under the Nasdaq corporate governance rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by an individual, group or another company is a “Controlled Company” and thus is exempt frommay elect not to comply with certain of its corporate governance requirements, including the requirement that a majority of the board members be “Independent Directors.”

5

Director Independence and Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board reviews director independence annually based on the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.Nasdaq. On such basis, the Board has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Ayers, Ferguson and Lowden and Ms. Tudor are independent.

The Board had two standing committees during fiscal 2021:2023: an Executive Committee, and an Audit/Compensation Committee. The Company did not have a separate nominating committee during fiscal 2021.2023. As a Controlled Companycontrolled company under the Nasdaq corporate governance rules, the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq do not require that the Company have a nominating committee.

The Executive Committee. The Executive Committee can exercise the powers of the full Board between meetings of the Board, except for powers that may not be delegated to a committee of the Board under the North Carolina Business Corporation Act. During fiscal 2021,2023, the Executive Committee consisted of Messrs. Robert P. Ingle, II Ronald B. Freeman and James W. Lanning.Lanning and Ms. Patricia E. Jackson.
4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Audit/Compensation Committee. The Board has established, through the Company’s Bylaws, an Audit/Compensation Committee. When acting in its capacity as Audit Committee, this committee acts under the authority of and has the responsibilities described in the Company’s Audit Committee Charter. The Audit Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website at www.ingles-markets.com (information contained on or accessible through our website is not part of this Proxy Statement). In this capacity, the committee is responsible for, among other things, recommending the engagement of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, approving the fees and services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, overseeing the independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing and evaluating significant matters relating to the audit and internal controls of the Company, reviewing the scope and results of audits by, and recommendations of, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and establishing and administering the Company’s Related Party Transaction policy. In addition, the committee reviews the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company.

The Audit/Compensation Committee does not have a separate Compensation Committee charter. When the Committeecommittee is acting in its capacity as the Compensation Committee, the Board has empowered the committee to:

approve compensation levels and increases in compensation of each executive officer and of other associates of the Company whose annual base salary is in excess of $500,000; and

approve all incentive payments to executive officers and any incentive payments in excess of $250,000, paid in cash or property, in any calendar year to any other associate that does not work in one of the Company’s supermarkets.

approve compensation levels and increases in compensation of each executive officer and of other associates of the Company whose annual base salary is in excess of $500,000; and
approve all incentive payments to executive officers and any incentive payments in excess of $250,000, paid in cash or property, in any calendar year to any other associate that does not work in one of the Company’s supermarkets.
Furthermore, the Committee,committee, when acting as the Compensation Committee, administers the Company’s associate benefit plans and other compensation matters where independent, disinterested administration is required by applicable tax or securities laws and regulations. Where such laws or regulations require that grants or awards under a stock-based employee benefit plan be made by the full Board or by a committee of non-employee or outside directors, the Committeecommittee or the Board, as appropriate, makes such decisions.

During fiscal 2021,2023, the Audit/Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Ayers and Ferguson and Ms. Tudor. The Board has determined that each member of the committee is independent for purposes of the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, and the Nasdaq corporate governance rules regarding audit committees. The Board has also determined that Mr. Ayers is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under the rules of the SecuritiesSEC.
Board Leadership Structure and Exchange Commission.

6Role in Risk Oversight

The Chairman of the Board is charged with acting as a liaison between the Board and our management team. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for providing daily leadership and oversight of our performance.
Mr. Ingle, II has served as the Chairman of the Board since May 2004, and Mr. Lanning has served as the Chief Executive Officer since March 2016.

Our Board is responsible for overseeing our risk management process, focusing on our general risk management strategy, the most significant risks facing us, and overseeing the implementation of management’s risk mitigation strategies. Our Board is also apprised of particular risk management matters in connection with its general oversight and approval of corporate matters and significant transactions.
Oversight of risk within the organization is an evolving process that requires the Company to continually look for opportunities to further embed systematic enterprise risk management into ongoing business processes across the organization. The Board encourages management to continue to review and improve its methods of assessing and mitigating risk.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions

All

Executive compensation decisions made during fiscal 20212023, that were not made exclusively by the Board or the Audit/Compensation Committee, were made by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, and in certain instances in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer.appropriate members of management. Messrs. Ayers and Ferguson and Ms. Tudor did not have any relationships with the Company that would require disclosure under “Transactions With Related Persons,” nor would any relationship be considered a compensation committee interlock requiring disclosure in this Proxy Statement pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. None of our named executive officers served as a member of a compensation committee or a director of another entity under the circumstances requiring disclosure in this Proxy Statement pursuant to SEC rules and regulations.
5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees; Director Compensation

The Board held four formal meetings during fiscal 2021.2023. The Executive Committee held no formal meetings during fiscal 2021,2023 but met periodically on an informal basis. The Audit/Compensation Committee held 11ten formal meetings during fiscal 2021,2023 and met periodically on an informal basis during Board meetings and as required for other purposes. EachOther than Mr. Lowden, each director attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board and of the committees of the Board on which he or she served during fiscal 2021. 2023.See “Committees of the Board of Directors.”

Directors who are not officers of the Company or any of its subsidiaries are paid an annual retainer of $15,000 plus $1,250 for each Board or Committeecommittee meeting they attend in person.attend. Audit/Compensation Committee members other than the Chairman of such committee are also paid an additional annual retainer of $10,000 for service on such Committee,committee, and the Chairman of the Audit/Compensation Committee is paid an additional annual retainer of $15,000.

The following director compensation table sets forth, for the fiscal year ended September 25, 2021,30, 2023, the cashtotal compensation paid by the Company to its outside directors. There were no other itemsdirectors, all of compensationwhich was paid to outside directors for the fiscal year ended September 25, 2021.

Name 

Fees

Earned or Paid

in Cash

($)

 

Total

($)

Fred D. Ayers 35,000 35,000
Ernest E. Ferguson 30,008 30,008
John R. Lowden 20,000 20,000
Laura Ingle Sharp 20,000 20,000
Brenda S. Tudor 30,008 30,008

in cash.

Name
Fees
Earned or Paid
in Cash
($)
Total
($)
Fred D. Ayers
42,500
42,500
Ernest E. Ferguson
37,508
37,508
John R. Lowden
16,250
16,250
Laura Ingle Sharp
20,000
20,000
Brenda S. Tudor
37,508
37,508
Director Nominations

As noted above, the Company did not have a standing nominating committee in fiscal 2021. Historically, the Board of Directors has not considered a nominating committee necessary in that there have been few vacancies on the

The Company’s Board and vacancies have beenare filled through discussions between the Chairman of the Board, and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company with input from other Board members, and members of management, as needed.appropriate. Under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, 25% of the directors of the Company are elected by the holders of Class A Common Stock, voting as a separate class, and the remaining directors are elected by holders of the Class B Common Stock, voting as a separate class. Mr. Ingle II, the Chairman of the Company,Board, is also the majority holder of the outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock as a result of being appointed the trustee with sole voting and dispositive power of trusts established by his father, Robert P. Ingle, in connection with his estate plan.

The Board has not adopted a policy with respect to minimum qualifications for Board members. Conversely, with respect to each individual vacancy, the Board has determined the specific personal and professional qualifications and skills required to fill that vacancy and tovacancies which complement the existing qualifications and skills of the other Board members. Historically, the Company has not engaged third parties to assist in identifying and evaluating potential nominees but would do so in those situations where particular qualifications are required to fill a vacancy and the Board’s and management’s contacts are not sufficient to identify an appropriate candidate.

7

Although we have not adopted a formal policy regarding the consideration of Board candidates recommended by our stockholders, the Board believes that the establishment of a formal policy is not necessary. For additional important information regarding stockholder nominations of directors and stockholder proposals, please see the “Other Matters” section of this Proxy Statement.

Stockholder Communication with Board Members

The Company maintains contact information, both telephone and email, on its website, www.ingles-markets.com, under the heading “Talk to Us.” By following the “Talk to Us” link, a stockholder will be given access to the Company’s telephone number and mailing address as well as a link for providing email correspondence to Investor Relations. Communications sent to Investor Relations and specifically marked as a communication for the Board will be forwarded to the Board or specific members of the Board as directed in the stockholder communication. In addition, communications received via telephone for the Board are forwarded to the Board by an officer of the Company.

Board Member Attendance at Annual Meetings

The Company generally requires that all directors attend the annual meeting of stockholders, absentstockholders. All Board members were present at the 2023 Annual Meeting except for one due to extraordinary circumstances. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all Board and Committee meetings since March 2020 have been held electronically.

86

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Board Diversity
The Company believes that it is important that the Board is composed of individuals reflecting the diversity of our associates, stockholders and the communities we serve, and so the Board considers diversity when identifying director nominees.
As required by rules of Nasdaq that were approved by the SEC in August 2021, we are providing information about the gender and demographic diversity of our directors in the matrix format required by Nasdaq rules. Each term used in the matrix has the meaning given to it in the Nasdaq rules and related instructions. The information in the matrix below is based solely on information provided by our directors about their gender and demographic self-identification.
Board Diversity Matrix (As of January 4, 2024)
Total Number of Directors
8
 
Female
Male
Non-
Binary
Did Not
Disclose
Gender
Part I: Gender Identity
 
 
 
 
Directors
3
5
Part II: Demographic Background
 
 
 
 
African American or Black
Alaskan Native or Native American
Asian
Hispanic or Latinx
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White
3
5
7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AUDIT/COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The following report of the Audit/Compensation Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission nor shall this report be incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Audit/Compensation Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the Company’s financial statements and the financial reporting process including the systems of internal controls. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and issuing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles.

In connection with the preparation and filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended September 25, 2021:

(1)       The Audit/Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements with management;

(2)       30, 2023:

(1)
The Audit/Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements with management;
(2)
The Audit/Compensation Committee discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm those matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees,” as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and the matters required to be reported to the Audit Committee by the independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 2.07; and
(3)
The Audit/Compensation Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Deloitte’s communications with the Audit/Compensation Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte its independence.
The Audit/Compensation Committee discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm those matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees,” as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and the matters required to be reported to the Audit Committee by the independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 2.07; and

(3)       The Audit/Compensation Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit/Compensation Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP its independence.

The Audit/Compensation Committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their audit of the Company’s financial statements. The Audit/Compensation Committee meets periodically with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. The Audit/Compensation Committee held 11ten meetings during fiscal 2021.

2023.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit/Compensation Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors (and the Board approved) that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 25, 2021,30, 2023, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

SEC.

SUBMITTED BY:


THE AUDIT/COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Fred D. Ayers Ernest E. Ferguson Brenda S. Tudor

98

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The following discussion and analysis isare intended to provide an understanding of the actual compensation earned by each of the Company’s named executive officers (“Executive Officers”), and describes the Company’s compensation objectives and policies as applied to these Executive Officers.

Compensation Philosophy. The objectives of the Company’s compensation program are to (1) attract, motivate, develop and retain top quality executives who will drive long-term stockholder value and (2) deliver competitive total compensation packages based upon both Company and individual performance. The Company wants its executives to balance the risks and related opportunities inherent in its industry and in the performance of their duties and share the upside opportunity and the downside risks once actual performance is measured.

The Audit/Compensation Committee is responsible for administering executive compensation. The duties of this committee are set forth under the heading “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS – Committees of the Board of Directors – Audit/Compensation Committee.” To achieve the objectives of the Company’s compensation program, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Audit/Compensation Committee have set forth a compensation program for its Executive Officers that is reviewed annually. It includes the following elements:

Base annual cash salary;

Annual cash incentive bonuses; and

Retirement, health and other benefits.

Base annual cash salary;
Annual cash incentive bonuses; and
Retirement, health and other benefits.
The Company does not have any Employment, Change in Controlemployment, change of control or Severance Agreementsseverance agreements with any of its Executive Officers. The Company believes in trust, loyalty and commitment from both the Company and the Executive Officers and believes that such agreements are not necessary to achieve its goals and the needs of the Executive Officers.

Factors Considered in Determining Compensation. The Company’s Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer, and members of management periodically review the compensation paid by the Company to its Executive Officers and other associates. Based on the Company’s general performance and that of the individual Executive Officer, they make final subjective determinations are made with respect to any changes to be made to that compensation. Bonuses paid to officers of the Company’s subsidiary, Milkco, Inc. (“Milkco”), are based on a percentage of Milkco’s earnings before taxes and payment of bonuses.

Neither the full Board nor the Audit/Compensation Committee generally reviews or ratifies the decisions of the Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer, and members of management relating to executive compensation unless otherwise required by the Company’s Bylaws, by resolutions adopted by the Board, or by the North Carolina Business Corporation Act. Decisions are made by the Board or the Audit/Compensation Committee if such decisions require the adoption of documents relating to employee benefit plans or programs. In addition, the Audit/Compensation Committee is required by resolution of the Board of Directors to approve any increases in compensation that the Company will pay to an associate whose base salary is in excess of $500,000, all incentive compensation that the Company will pay to Executive Officers and any incentive payments in excess of $250,000 that the Company will pay to any other associate who does not work in one of the Company’s supermarkets. Certain managers that work in the Company’s supermarkets are paid incentive compensation based on each individual store’s operating profit. These incentive payments may exceed $250,000 and are not approved by the Audit/Compensation Committee.

10

The Internal Revenue Code generally provides that corporate deductions will be disallowed for annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to certain executive officers of publicly held corporations. “Performance-based” compensation is excluded from the cap. The $1 million compensation deduction cap would be applicable to the Executive Officers named in the “Summary Compensation Table”. The Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and the Audit/Compensation Committee, as appropriate, intend to consider the Internal Revenue Code’s compensation deductibility cap when they determine compensation levels and to evaluate appropriate alternatives to mitigate any adverse impact this limitation may have on the deductibility of executive compensation paid by the Company and its subsidiaries.

Elements of Executive Compensation

Base Salary.Base salary is used to attract and retain Executive Officers and is determined using publicly available comparisons with industry competitors and other relevant factors, including, among others, the seniority of the individual, the functional role of the position, the level of the individual’s responsibility and ability to replace the individual. The information is used subjectively without benchmarking in the determination of base salaries. The base salaries paid to the Executive Officers during fiscal 20212023 are shown in the Summary Compensation Table presented in this proxy statement.

Proxy Statement.

Cash Incentive Bonus Awards. Annual cash bonuses are a significant component of each Executive Officer’s compensation, reflecting the Company’s belief that management’s contribution to long-term stockholder returns comes from maximizing earnings and the potential of the Company.
9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Each Executive OfficersOfficer of the Company receivedreceives a bonus, the amountsamount of which wereis subjectively determined taking into consideration Company profitability and the Executive Officer’s performance for the fiscal year to which the bonus relates. This subjective determination is made by Mr. Ingle IIthe Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Lanning,in certain circumstances, consultation with members of management, and approved by the Audit/Compensation Committee. The bonus paid to Mr. Collins,Hogan, President of the Company’s subsidiary, Milkco, Inc., isalso receives a performance based on a percentage of Milkco’s earnings before taxes and payment of bonuses. Mr. Collins receives aincentive bonus equal to a percentage of Milkco’s earnings before taxes and payment of bonuses, up to a maximum of $49,950 per year. Based on Milkco’s expected financial performance, the Company anticipates that Mr. CollinsHogan will continue to receive at or near the maximum bonus.

Retirement, Health and Other Benefits.

Investment/Profit Sharing Plan. The Company maintains the Ingles Markets, Incorporated Investment/Profit Sharing Plan (the “Profit Sharing Plan”) to provide retirement benefits to eligible associates, including Executive Officers. The Profit Sharing Plan includes 401(k) associate elective contributions, discretionary employer matching contributions and discretionary profit sharing contribution features. The assets of the Profit Sharing Plan are held in trust for participants and are available for distribution upon the retirement, disability, death, in-service following age 59 ½12 (upon request) or other termination of employment of the participant. Quarterly, the Company, in its discretion, determines the amount of any Company profit sharing contributions and the amount of any matching contributions to be made based on participants’ 401(k) contributions for the quarter. During fiscal 2021,2023, the Company matched associate contributions at a rate of $0.75 for each dollar of associate contributions up to 5% of the associate’s salary.

Associates who participate in the Profit Sharing Plan may contribute to their 401(k) account between 1% and 50% (in increments of 1%) of their compensation by way of salary reductions that cannot exceed a maximum amount that varies annually in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code. Highly compensated participants are limited to 3%. The Company also makes available to Profit Sharing Plan participants the ability to direct the investment of their 401(k) accounts (including the Company’s matching contributions) in various investment funds, including a fund holding Class A Common Stock of the Company.

The Company did not make a discretionary profit sharing contribution to the Profit Sharing Plan for fiscal 2021.

112023.

Company discretionary employer matching cash contributions to the Profit Sharing Plan totaled $5.1$5.7 million for fiscal 2021.2023. These contributions were allocated to the matching contribution accounts in each participant’s 401(k) account. The Company’s contributions to each of the Executive Officers are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.Table presented in this Proxy Statement. As of September 25, 2021,30, 2023, all of the Executive Officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table were 100% vested in their accounts. Participants’ interests in employer contributions allocated to their accounts vest over six years.

two years; 50% year one and 100% year two.

Nonqualified Investment Plan. The Company maintains an Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan to provide benefits similar to the Profit Sharing Plan to certain of the Company’s highly compensated associates and pharmacists (in the Company’s stores) who are otherwise limited in their associate elective contributions under the 401(k) feature of the Profit Sharing Plan. Associates who participate in the Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan may contribute between one percent and seventy-five percent of base pay and up to one hundred percent of bonus pay (in increments of one percent) of their compensation by way of salary reductions. In addition, the Company may make discretionary matching contributions. The Company’s contributions to each of the Executive Officers are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.Table presented in this Proxy Statement. During fiscal 2021,2023, the Company matched associate contributions at a rate of $0.75 for each dollar of associate contributions up to 2% of the associate’s earnings. As of September 25, 2021,30, 2023, all of the Executive Officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table were 100% vested in their accounts. Participants’ interests in contributions allocated to their accounts vest over six years. Company contributions to the Nonqualified Excess Plan were approximately $375,000$509,000 in fiscal 2021.

2023.

Insurance.The Company currently makes available to its Executive Officers and all associates a comprehensive health, dental, vision, life and disability insurance program. The health care insurance offers a variety of coverage options, at the associate’s discretion. The Company maintains, at its expense, for the benefit of each of its full-time associates, life insurance policies in amounts up to $150,000$500,000 based on the compensation of the associate. The premiums paid by the Company for the benefit of Executive Officers are included in the Summary Compensation Table.Table presented in this Proxy Statement.
10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stockholder Vote on Executive Compensation
At the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company held on February 14, 2023, the Company’s stockholders voted, on an advisory, non-binding basis, on the compensation paid to the Company’s Executive Officers, otherwise referred to as “say on pay.” The Company’s stockholders voted overwhelmingly to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s Executive Officers. The Company’s Board considered the recommendations of the stockholders and determined that the Company would not make any material modifications to the compensation arrangements for the Executive Officers.
Management of Compensation – Related Risk

The Company’s Board of Directors has considered and determined that risks arising from the Company’s compensation policies and practices for its associates, including the Executive Officers, are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

12

Audit/Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

The Audit/Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” set forth above in this Proxy Statement. Based on such review, the related discussions and such other matters deemed relevant and appropriate by the Audit/Compensation Committee, the Audit/Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement.

SUBMITTED BY:

THE AUDIT/COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Fred D. Ayers Ernest E. Ferguson Brenda S. Tudor

1311

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation Summary

The following tables set forth information concerning the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each of its other Executive Officers for the fiscal year ended September 25, 2021.

years indicated.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position during 2021 Fiscal
Year
 

Salary

($)

 

Bonus

($)

 

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

($)

 

All Other Compensation

($) (1)

 

Total

($)

James W. Lanning 2021 903,333 1,025,000        46,337 1,974,670
Chief Executive Officer and 2020 752,892 475,000        32,048 1,259,940
     President    2019 742,293 470,000        27,246 1,239,539
             
Robert P. Ingle 2021 853,333 975,000        49,303 1,877,636
Chairman of the Board 2020 693,293 400,000        37,545 1,130,838
      2019 682,692 400,000        32,967 1,115,660
             
Ronald B. Freeman 2021 383,979 225,000        13,915    622,894
Vice President Finance, 2020 371,803 130,000        11,257    513,060
     Chief Financial Officer (3) 2019 363,117 112,000          9,415    484,532
             
L. Keith Collins 2021 271,875   60,000     47,740(2)       16,727    396,342
President, Milkco, Inc. 2020 261,362  — 46,187       13,928    321,477
  2019 248,761  — 45,981       11,830    306,572
             

Name and Principal
Position
Fiscal
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)(1)
Total
($)
James W. Lanning
Chief Executive Officer and President
2023
1,118,462
2,115,000
57,518
3,290,980
2022
1,004,375
​1,450,000
50,991
​2,505,366
2021
903,333
1,175,000
46,337
2,124,670
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Robert P. Ingle
Chairman of the Board
2023
1,194,904
6,645,000
111,468
7,951,372
2022
1,053,333
​4,685,000
79,962
​5,818,295
2021
853,333
2,775,000
49,303
3,677,636
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Patricia E. Jackson
Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer(2)
2023
411,442
315,000
19,158
745,600
2022
285,633
270,000
1,624
557,257
 
Michael D. Hogan
President, Milkco, Inc.(3)
2023
321,058
50,000
​49,950
17,962
438,970
(1)
All other fiscal 20212023 compensation for each of the Executive Officers consists of the following:

  Fiscal 2021
   James W.
Lanning
   Robert P.
Ingle, II
   

Ronald B.

Freeman

   L. Keith
Collins
 
Employer Match for 401(k) Plan $6,413  $6,413  $6,837  $6,361 
Employer Match for Non-Qualified Plan  29,002   27,358   5,755   5,743 
Life Insurance  234   234   234   234 
Accidental Death & Dismemberment  and                
     Long-Term Disability Insurance  1,089   1,089   1,089   1,089 
Travel Expenses  9,600   14,210      3,300 

 
Fiscal 2023
 
James W.
Lanning
Robert P.
Ingle, II
Patricia E.
Jackson
Michael D.
Hogan
Employer Match for 401(k) Plan
$7,425
$7,425
$12,938
$7,840
Employer Match for Non-Qualified Plan
38,642
88,170
4,549
5,373
Life Insurance
960
960
780
559
Accidental Death & Dismemberment and Long-Term Disability Insurance
891
891
891
891
Travel Expenses
9,600
14,022
3,300
(2)
(2)Ms. Jackson was named Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, effective February 23, 2022.
(3)
Mr. Collins receives a bonus equal to a percentageHogan was named President of Milkco’s earnings before taxes and payment of bonuses, up to a maximum of $49,950 per year.

(3)Mr. Freeman announced his retirement from the Company on December 27, 2021,Milkco, Inc., effective February 16,October 1, 2022.

1412

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CEO Pay Ratio

SEC rules require that the Company disclose the total annual compensation of James W. Lanning, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), the median of the total annual compensation of all associates other than Mr. Lanning (“Median Annual Compensation”), as well as their ratio to each other (referred to as the “CEO pay ratio”), which we base on data as of September 17, 20212023 (the “Determination Date”). Our associate population consists of a number of part-time associates, most of them compensated on an hourly basis. As noted in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 25, 2021,30, 2023, approximately 58%53% of the Company’s associates work on a part-time basis. The Company’s median associate for fiscal 20212023 was a full-time, hourly associate who was paid for less than forty hours during the week containing the Determination Date.

For fiscal 2021:

2023:
Mr. Lanning’s total compensation: $3,290,980
Median Annual Compensation: $22,708
Ratio of CEO total compensation to Median Annual Compensation: 145:1
This CEO pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in good faith, in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. To identify the Median Annual Compensation, we took the following steps:
Mr. Lanning’s total compensation: $1,974,670

Median Annual Compensation: $19,793

Ratio of CEO total compensation to Median Annual Compensation: 100:1

This CEO pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in good faith, in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. To identify the Median Annual Compensation we took the following steps:

For the week ending with the Determination Date, 23,32626,253 active associates received cash compensation. This population consisted of full-time, part-time and temporary associates for the Company and all of its subsidiaries.

The Company used gross wages including salary, wages, overtime and any other cash compensation for the week ending the determination date to identify the median associate.

For this associate, we multiplied the weekly wages by 5253 weeks to determine Median Annual Compensation of $19,793.$22,708.

We calculated the CEO pay ratio taking into account that CEO compensation includes amounts other than weekly salary.

SEC rules for the CEO pay ratio allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the CEO pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to what the Company reports.

1513

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pay Versus Performance

In accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following disclosure regarding executive compensation and Company performance for the years listed below. The Compensation Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for any of the years shown.

 
 
 
 
 
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based on(3)
 
 
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO(1)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO(2)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Non-PEO
NEOs(1)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs(2)
Total
Shareholder
Return
Peer-Group
Total
Shareholder
Return
Net
Income
($000s)
Net
Sales
($000s)
2023
$3,290,980
$3,290,980
$3,045,314
$3,045,314
$213
$131
$210,812
$5,892,782
2022
$2,505,366
$2,505,366
$1,753,173
$1,753,173
$229
$117
$272,759
$5,678,835
2021
$2,124,670
$2,124,670
$1,583,027
$1,583,027
$182
$118
$249,731
$4,987,920

(1)
The amounts reflect the Summary Compensation Table total compensation figures for James W. Lanning, our principal executive officer (“PEO”), for each of the years listed. The Non-PEO NEOs (named executive officers) for who the Summary Compensation Table total average compensation is presented are: for 2023, Robert P. Ingle, Patricia E. Jackson, and Michael D. Hogan; for 2022, Robert P. Ingle, Patricia E. Jackson, Ronald B. Freeman, and Larry K. Collins; for 2021, Robert P. Ingle, Ronald B. Freeman, and Larry K. Collins.
(2)
The amounts shown for Compensation Actually Paid and Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. These amounts reflect total compensation as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table above for each year. None of the adjustments required by Item 402(v) are applicable to the Company.
(3)
This column shows Company Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) and peer group TSR on a cumulative basis for each year of the three-year period from 2021 through 2023. For purposes of this disclosure, the peer group consists of the peer group used for our stock performance graph, as presented in Item 5 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023. The companies making up the peer group, in no particular order, are Ingles Markets, Inc., Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize N.V., Weis Markets, Inc., The Kroger Co., SpartanNash Co., Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc., and Village Super Market, Inc. Dollar values assume $100 was invested for the cumulative period from September 26, 2020 to September 30, 2023, in either the Company or the peer group, and reinvestment of the pre-tax value of dividends paid. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Company Cumulative Total Shareholder Return (TSR).

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs, and the Company Cumulative TSR for each year of the three-year period from 2021 through 2023.
graphic
14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Company Net Income.

The following charts sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs, and Company Net Income for each year of the three-year period from 2021 to 2023.
graphic

Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Company Net Sales.

The following charts sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs, and Company Net Sales for each year of the three-year period from 2021 to 2023.
graphic
Relationship Between Company TSR and Peer Group TSR.

The following chart sets forth the relationship between our cumulative TSR and the TSR for the peer group for each year of the three-year period from 2021 through 2023.
graphic
15

Proposal for Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Section 14A of the Exchange Act enable our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory, non-binding, basis, the compensation paid to our Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules.
The Board of Directors is providing stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory, non-binding vote on the compensation of our Executive Officers.Officers, as described under the heading “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION – Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”)” of this Proxy Statement and the compensation tables and narrative disclosures following the CD&A. This proposal, commonly known as a “say on pay” proposal, gives you, as a stockholder, the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our fiscal 20212023 executive compensation programs and policies and the compensation paid to the Executive Officers.

This advisory vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Executive Officers and our compensation philosophy, policies and practices, as described in this Proxy Statement.

The Company’s compensation program is administered by the Audit/Compensation Committee of the Board, which is composed entirely of independent directors and carefully considers many different factors, as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,”the CD&A in order to provide appropriate compensation for the Company’s executives. The objectives of the Company’s compensation program are to (1) attract, motivate, develop and retain top quality executives who will drive long-term stockholder value and (2) deliver competitive total compensation packages based upon both the Company and individual performance. The Company wants its executives to balance the risks and related opportunities inherent in its industry and in the performance of their duties, and share the upside opportunity and the downside risks once actual performance is measured.

The Board appreciates and values stockholders’ views and recommends a vote “FOR” the proposal for the advisory vote on executive compensation.

compensation, as stated by the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the CD&A, the 2023 Summary Compensation Table, and the other related tables and disclosures.”
The say on pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee. Our Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of this vote in considering future compensation arrangements.
16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

Except where indicated in the footnotes below, the following table sets forth the number of shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock owned beneficially as of September 25, 2021,30, 2023, by each director and nominee for director, each of the executive officers of the Company named in the Summary Compensation Table presented in this Proxy Statement, all directors and executive officers as a group and each person known by the Company to be a beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of either class of the outstanding Common Stock. The table also sets forth the percentage of each class of Common Stock held by such stockholders. As of September 25, 2021,30, 2023, there were 14,271,33514,497,075 shares of Class A Common Stock and 4,723,0414,497,301 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding. Except as otherwise indicated, each beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power with respect to the Common Stock listed.

  

Number of Shares

Owned Beneficially

 

 

Percentage of

Common Stock

 

  Percentage of Total Voting Power 
Name  Class A(2)   Class B   Class A(2)   Class B     
Robert P. Ingle, II(1)  4,350,649 (3)(4)
 4,350,649 (3)(4)  23.4%(3)(4)  92.1%(3)(4)  70.7%(3)(4)
James W. Lanning(1)  157,399 (3)  147,399 (3)  1.1%(3)  3.1%(3)  2.4%(3)
Laura Ingle Sharp(1)  87,911 (5)  79,725 (5)  0.6%(5)  1.7%(5)  1.3%(5)
Ronald B. Freeman(1)  150,339 (3)  147,399 (3)  1.0%(3)  3.1%(3)  2.4%(3)
Fred D. Ayers(1)  463   0   *   *   * 
Brenda S. Tudor(1)  300   0   *   *   * 
Ernest E. Ferguson(1)  250   0   *   *   * 
John R. Lowden(1)  600   0   *   *   * 
Mario J. Gabelli et al(6)  1,561,940 (7)  0   11.0%(7)  *   2.5%(7)
Dimensional Fund Advisors, LP(8)  1,181,113 (9)  0   8.3%(9)  *   1.9%(9)
The Vanguard Group (10)  1,153,511 (11)  0   8.1%(11)  *   1.8%(11)
Black Rock, Inc.(12)  1,171,145 (13)  0   8.2%(13)  *   1.9%(13)
River Road Asset Management, LLC (14)  892,609 (15)  0   6.3%(15)  *   1.5%(15)
LSV Asset Management (16)  740,835 (17)  0   5.2%(17)  *   1.2%(17)
Ingles Investment/Profit Sharing Plan(1)  147,399   147,399   1.0%  3.1%  2.4%
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (8 persons)  4,453,113 (3)  4,430,374 (3)  23.8%(3)  93.8%(3)  72.1%(3)

 
Number of Shares
Owned Beneficially
Percentage of
Common Stock
Percentage
of Total
Voting
Power
Name
Class A(2)
Class B
Class A(2)
Class B
 
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
 
 
 
 
 
Robert P. Ingle, II(1)
4,294,334(3)(4)
4,294,334(3)(4)
22.9%(3)(4)
95.5%(3)(4)
72.2%(3)(4)
James W. Lanning(1)
101,084(3)
91,084(3)
0.7%(3)
2.0%(3)
1.5%(3)
Michael David Hogan(1)
0
0
*
*
*
Laura Ingle Sharp(1)
42,700
0
0.3%
*
0.1%
Patricia E. Jackson(1)
91,084(3)
91,084(3)
0.6%(3)
2.0%(3)
1.5%(3)
Fred D. Ayers(1)
463
0
*
*
*
Brenda S. Tudor(1)
300
0
*
*
*
Ernest E. Ferguson(1)
250
0
*
*
*
John R. Lowden(1)
600
0
*
*
*
5% Stockholders:
 
 
 
 
 
Mario J. Gabelli et al(5)
981,105(6)
0
6.8%(6)
*
1.6%(6)
Dimensional Fund Advisors, LP(7)
1,197,177(8)
0
8.3%(8)
*
2.0%(8)
The Vanguard Group(9)
1,199,812(10)
0
8.3%(10)
*
2.0%(10)
BlackRock, Inc.(11)
1,061,766(12)
0
7.3%(12)
*
1.8%(12)
River Road Asset Management, LLC (13)
771,430(14)
0
5.3%(14)
*
1.3%(14)
Royce & Associates, LP(15)
738,286(16)
0
5.1%(16)
*
1.2%(16)
Ingles Investment/Profit Sharing Plan(1)
91,084
91,084
0.6%
2.0%
1.8%
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (9 persons)
4,348,647(3)
4,294,334(3)
23.1%(3)
95.5%(3)
72.3%(3)
*
Less than 1%.

(1)
The address of thisall beneficial ownerowners, apart from Mr. Hogan, is P.O. Box 6676, Asheville, North Carolina 28816. Mr. Hogan’s address is 220 Deaverview Road, Asheville, North Carolina 28806.

(2)
Each share of Class B Common Stock is convertible, at any time at the option of the holder, into one share of Class A Common Stock. If the holder of any shares of Class B Common Stock transfers the shares to anyone other than a “qualified transferee” as defined in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, then each share of Class B Common Stock will automatically convert into a share of Class A Common Stock. Accordingly, for each holder of Class B Common Stock the number of shares and percentage of Class A Common Stock set forth in this table also reflect the Class A Common Stock into which such stockholder’s shares of Class B Common Stock are convertible. However, these converted shares are not used to calculate such percentages for any other stockholder in this table. The number of shares and percentage of Class A Common Stock held by all directors and executive officers as a group also reflects the conversion into Class A Common Stock of each share of Class B Common Stock held by each director and executive officer. Because the Class B Common Stock converts into Class A Common Stock on a one to one basis, the number of shares of Class B Common Stock noted in the table above also represents the number of shares of Class A Common Stock each holder would beneficially own upon conversion of the Class B Common Stock beneficially owned by them.

17

(3)
Includes the 147,39991,084 shares of Class B Common Stock held by the Company’s Profit Sharing Plan, of which Messrs. Ingle II Freeman and Lanning and Ms. Jackson are trustees. The trustees, by a majority vote, have sole voting power and dispositive power with respect to such shares. However, Messrs. Ingle II Freeman and Lanning and Ms. Jackson disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares.

(4)
Includes a total of 4,350,6494,203,250 shares of Class B Common Stock held by trustsin a trust of which Mr. Ingle II is sole trustee with sole voting power and dispositive power with respect to such shares.shares and an LLC.

(5)Includes 686 shares of Class A Common Stock and 2,025 shares of Class B Common Stock held by Ms. Sharp’s minor children.

(6)
The address of this beneficial owner is GAMCO Investors, Inc., One Corporate Center, Rye, New York 10580-1435.
17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(7)(6)
The information as to Mario J. Gabelli (includes entities controlled directly or indirectly by Mario Gabelli, collectively, the “Gabelli Entities”) with respect to the number of shares beneficially owned by the Gabelli Entities is derived from its Schedule 13D/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 17, 2021.24, 2022. All other information regarding the Gabelli Entities is derived from such Schedule. Such Schedule discloses that (i) Mario Gabelli is the chief investment officer for most of the Gabelli Entities signing such statements and is deemed to have beneficial ownership of the shares owned by all Gabelli Entities, (ii) Mario Gabelli and the Gabelli Entities do not admit that they constitute a group within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder and (iii) Mario Gabelli and the Gabelli Entities have the sole power to vote or direct the vote and dispose or to direct the disposition of all the shares of which they are beneficial owners. The Gabelli Entities that beneficially own shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock are registered investment advisors and beneficially own such shares in an agent capacity.

(8)(7)
The address for this beneficial owner is Palisades West, Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One, Austin, TX 78746.

(9)(8)
The information as to the number of shares beneficially owned by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is derived from its Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2021.10, 2023. All other information as to Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is also derived from such Schedule. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, furnishes investment advice to four investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and serves as investment manager or sub-advisor to certain other commingled funds, group trusts and separate accounts (such investment companies, trusts and accounts, collectively referred to as the “Funds”). In certain cases, subsidiaries of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP may act as an adviser or sub-adviser to certain Funds. In its role as investment advisor, sub-adviser and/or manager, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP or its subsidiaries (collectively, “Dimensional”) may possess voting and/or investment power over the securities of the IssuerCompany that are owned by the Funds, and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of the IssuerCompany held by the Funds. However, all securities reported in this schedulesuch Schedule are owned by the Funds. Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities.

(10)(9)
The address for this beneficial owner is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

(10)
(11)The shares are beneficially owned by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) and subsidiaries of Vanguard. The information as to Vanguardthis beneficial owner with respect to the number of shares beneficially owned by The Vanguard Group is derived from its Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2021.9, 2023.

(11)
(12)
The address for this beneficial owner is 55 WestEast 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(13)(12)
The shares are beneficially owned by subsidiaries of Black Rock,BlackRock, Inc. The information as to this beneficial owner with respect to the number of shares beneficially owned by Black Rock,BlackRock, Inc. is derived from its Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 29, 2021.31, 2023.

18

(13)
(14)
The address for this beneficial owner is 462 S. 4th Street, Suite 2000, Louisville, KY 40202.

(14)
(15)

The information as to this beneficial owner with respect to the number of shares beneficially owned by River Road Asset Management, LLC is derived from its Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2021. 

2023.

(15)
(16)

The address for this beneficial owner is 155 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, IL 60606. 

745 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10151.

(16)
(17)

The information as to this beneficial owner with respect to the number of shares beneficially owned by LSV Asset ManagementRoyce & Associates, LP is derived from its Schedule 13G/A13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2021. 

January 23, 2023.

1918

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

The Company monitors certainrelated party relationships and related party transactions by requiring that each director and executive officer to notify the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Executive Committee in advance of any upcoming transactionsproposed transaction that may be considered a transaction with a related person. The Company has adopted a formal Related Party Transactions policy that requires, among other things: notification to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer in advance of any upcoming transaction that may be considered a transaction with a related person; and review and approval or disapproval by the Audit Committee of the Board for all such proposed transaction in excess of $120,000 to ensure compliance with the above guidelines,such policy, Nasdaq rules, and SEC regulations. In addition, each director and executive officer completes an annual questionnaire to disclose anythat requires disclosure of all transactions with related persons.

All transactions with related persons described below were reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee.

The Company will from time to time makeextends short-term, non-interest bearing loans to the Company’s Profit Sharing Plan to allow the Profit Sharing Plan to meet distribution obligations during a time when the Profit Sharing Plan wasis prohibited from selling shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. During fiscal 2021,2023, the Company provided a $0.4 million$330,000 loan to the Company’s Profit Sharing Plan that was subsequently repaid in full. As of the date of this filing, there were no loans outstanding.

The Company will from time to time purchasepurchases from the Profit Sharing Plan shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock to meet distribution obligations of the Profit Sharing Plan. There were no such transactions during fiscal 2021.2023. The per share purchase price for these transactions is equal to the closing sales price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market for the day prior to the purchase.

In March 2021, the

The Company approved the repurchaseis party to leases, with a limited liability corporation, of 1.3 million shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock from a trust that is part of the estate ofwhich Robert P. Ingle former CEO and DirectorII, the Company’s Chairman of the Company.Board, is one of its principals. The Company’s aggregate purchase price paid forannual lease payment obligations under these leases are currently approximately $318,000.
During the repurchased shares was approximately $80.0 million,twelve months ended September 30, 2023, the Company purchased two properties, which was equal to the fair market value of the Company’s publicly traded Class A Common Stock at the time of the transaction. The transaction was approvedjoin property owned by the Company’s Executive Committee and Audit Committee inCompany, for a combined $5.8 million from a limited liability company having Mr.  Ingle II as one of its principals. In accordance with the Company’s related-party transactionRelated Party Transaction policy, independent fair market value appraisals were obtained to determine the purchase price.
During the twelve months ended September 30, 2023, the Company and regulatory guidelines.

a limited liability company having Mr. Ingle II, as one of its principals swapped adjoining properties, each having a value of approximately $600,000, in an even exchange. In accordance with the Company’s Related Party Transaction policy, independent fair market value appraisals were obtained.

The Company believes that the transactions described above were on terms no less favorable to the Company than those available from unaffiliated third parties in transactions negotiated at arms-length. The Company does not intend to enter into any transactions in the future with or involving any of its executive officers or directors or any members of their immediate family on terms that would be less favorable to the Company than those that would be available from unaffiliated third parties in arms-length transactions.

2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) has served as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company and its subsidiaries since 2012. The Company had no disagreements with Deloitte & Touche LLP on accounting and financial disclosures. Deloitte & Touche LLP’sDeloitte’s work on the Company’s audit for fiscal year 20212023 was performed by full-time, permanent employeesassociates and partners of the firm. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are not expected to be present at the 2022 Annual Meeting dueand they will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders.
Historically, the COVID-19 pandemic. Appropriate stockholder questions will be forwarded to representativesCompany has engaged its independent registered public accounting firm for a given fiscal year during February of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

Thethat year, therefore, while the Company has not yet appointed an independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s fiscal 20222024 financial statements, butit expects that Deloitte & Touche LLP towill be appointed in the near future.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The Company incurred fees in fiscal years 20212023 and 20202022 for services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP as set forth in the table below.

  

Deloitte & Touche LLP Year Ended September 25, 2021

 

 

 

Year Ended

September 26, 2020

 

Audit Fees $1,158,000  $1,025,000 
Audit-related Fees      
Tax Fees      
All Other Fees      
Total Fees $1,158,000  $1,025,000 

Deloitte
 
Year Ended
September 30, 2023
Year Ended
September 24, 2022
Audit Fees
$1,155,000
$1,005,000
Audit-related Fees
Tax Fees
All Other Fees
Total Fees
$1,155,000
$1,005,000
In the above tables:

“Audit fees” are fees billed by the independent registered public accounting firms for professional services for the audit of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, the audit of internal controls over financial reporting, review of consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and for services that are normally provided by the auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements;

“Audit-related fees” are fees for services performed during the respective years by the independent registered accounting firm for assurance and related services not reported under the caption “Audit Fees” in the tables above.

“Tax fees” are fees for services performed during the respective years by the independent registered public accounting firm for professional services related to certain tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning; and

“All other fees” are fees for any other services performed during the respective years.

The Company’s Audit/Compensation Committee pre-approved all services described above for fiscal 2021,2023, including non-audit services, and has determined that these fees and services are compatible with maintaining the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP.Deloitte. The Company’s Audit/Compensation Committee requires that each service provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP be pre-approved by the committee. However, the Committeecommittee has empowered the chair of the committee to grant such approval on its behalf as to matters that arise between Audit/Compensation Committee meetings.

2120

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE RESPONSIBILITY

Environmental Stewardship

The Company has several Green Initiativesgreen initiatives to improve sustainability in our stores, our products, and our distribution system. We believe these initiatives help combat the dangers of climate change and help protect our stakeholders from the risks of climate change. The most significant initiatives include:

LED lighting in our glass enclosed fixtures, saving 55-65% in energy consumption;

Skylights and automated energy management systems in our stores to turn down/turn off lights and equipment based on ambient light levels and customer proximity to coolers and freezers;

Heat rejection systems to recapture and recycle heat from refrigeration compressors, which also use less refrigerant and utilize types of refrigerant with a lower environmental impact;

Recycling of all plastic wrap, bags, pallets and wood products in our stores and our distribution center;

Recycling single-use plastic bags and promoting the use of re-usable bags, subject to safe COVID-19 practices;

Replacing our trucks with more energy efficient models and using backhauls wherever possible to minimize empty trucks on the roads;

Our car washes have reclaim systems to recycle water;

Many of our stores contain free charging stations for electric vehicles; and

We have reduced our paper advertising in favor of electronic communications.

LED lighting in our glass enclosed fixtures, saving 55-65% in energy consumption;
Skylights and automated energy management systems in our stores to turn down/turn off lights and equipment based on ambient light levels and customer proximity to coolers and freezers;
Heat rejection systems to recapture and recycle heat from refrigeration compressors, which also use less refrigerant and utilize types of refrigerant with a lower environmental impact;
Recycling of all plastic wrap, bags, pallets and wood products in our stores and our distribution center;
Recycling single-use plastic bags and promoting the use of re-usable bags;
Replacing our trucks with more energy efficient models and using backhauls wherever possible to minimize empty trucks on the roads;
Our car washes have reclaim systems to recycle water;
Many of our stores contain free charging stations for electric vehicles; and
We have reduced our paper advertising in favor of electronic communications.
Social Impact

The Company has always supported our communities across our entire store base. Each year, millions of pounds of food are provided to local food banks, food that might otherwise end up in landfills.

banks.

Our other community giving initiatives are focused on the education of children and meeting the specific needs of our communities. Each year we provide hundreds of thousands of dollars in direct financial support through our Tools for Schools program. We also conduct collection drives for school supplies, coats and toys for at-risk children.

Since the beginning of

During the COVID-19 pandemic which began in early 2020, our pharmacies have administered vaccines and have conducted outreach programs to enhance access to vaccines.

Governance

Other parts of this Proxy Statement address corporate governance issues at the Board and Audit/Compensation Committee level. Our Audit/Compensation Committee met 11ten times in fiscal year 2021,2023, including meetings directly with the Company’s Internal Audit Department and with the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firmindependent registered public accounting firm without Company management being present.

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its senior financial officers, including without limitation, its Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller. The full text of the Code of Ethics is published on the Company’s website at www.ingles-markets.com under the caption “Corporate.” In the event that the Company makes any amendments to, or grants any waivers of, any provision of the Code of Ethics applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer, the Company intends to promptly disclose such amendment or waiver on its website.

The Company does not currently have formal practices or policies with respect to the ability of associates (including officers) or directors to engage in hedging transactions with respect to the Company’s equity securities.
At Ingles Markets, we know we are so much more than a grocery store. We are made up of associates, customers, and vendors. The Company supports and encourages equality, diversity and inclusion throughout our Corporate Office, Distribution Center, Retail Storescorporate office, distribution center, retail stores and within each community we are located. The Company has enhanced its training and awareness programs for all associates to better understand our biases and to increase the encouragement of equality, diversity and inclusion.

22

Please refer to the “Human Capital”, “Environmental Matters” and “Government Regulation” sections in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 25, 2021,30, 2023, filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, on November 24, 2021.

29, 2023.
2321

PROPOSAL TO AMEND ARTICLES

TABLE OF INCORPORATION

Currently our Articles of Incorporation permit the transfer of Class B Common Stock to only a limited group of “Qualified Transferees”, as currently defined in our Articles of Incorporation without the Class B Common Stock automatically converting into Class A Common Stock. The proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation would revise and update the provision on permitted transfers to permit the transfer of Class B Common Stock to any corporation, limited liability company, partnership or other entity that is controlled by (a) the transferor, (b) an Immediate Family Member of the transferor, or (c) any one or more persons or entities that are each (w) a holder of Class B Common Stock on the date of transfer, or (x) an Immediate Family Member of a holder of Class B Common Stock on the date of transfer, or (z) a descendant of Robert P. Ingle. The amendment to the Articles would redefine “qualified transferees” to permit such transfers. This amendment has been approved by the Board of Directors and recommended by the Board of Directors for approval by our stockholders.

As noted elsewhere in this proxy, 4,350,649 shares of Class B Common Stock are held by trusts that are part of the estate of Robert P. Ingle, former CEO and Director of the Company, and the effect of the proposed amendment would be to permit the transfer of such shares more freely without their conversion to Class A Common Stock. Currently, Robert P. Ingle II is sole trustee with sole voting power and dispositive power with respect to such shares, and any currently contemplated transfer of such shares would likely be to an entity for estate planning purposes.

If this amendment is approved, Paragraph (b)(4)(A) of Article 4 of our Articles of Incorporation will be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

“4            Transfer.

(A)Any transfer of shares of Class B Common Stock other than to a “Qualified Transferee,” as hereinafter defined, shall be conclusively deemed to constitute an election by the holder thereof to convert said shares of Class B Common Stock into an equal number of shares of Class A Common Stock.   As used herein, the term “Qualified Transferee” means any one or more of: (i) any holder of Class B Common Stock that is a holder of Class B Common Stock immediately preceding the transfer, or (ii) any Immediate Family Member, as hereinafter defined, of a holder of Class B Common Stock on the date of transfer, or (iii) in the event of death or legal disability of a holder of Class B Common Stock, (a) such holder’s executor, administrator or personal representative, or (iv) the Ingles Markets, Incorporated Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, or (iv) any participant in the Ingles Markets, Incorporated Profit Sharing Plan and Trust that holds shares of Class B Common Stock in the participant’s Plan account on the date of transfer, or (v) a trust for the benefit of (a) the transferor, or (b) any Immediate Family Member of the transferor, or (c) any holder of Class B Common Stock, or (d) any Immediate Family Member of a holder of Class B Common Stock, or any descendant of Robert P. Ingle (individually referred to as a “Qualified Beneficiary”), if the trustee of such trust is (w) the transferor or an Immediate Family Member of the transferor, or (x) a holder of Class B Common Stock, or (y) an Immediate Family Member of a holder of Class B Common Stock, or (z) a descendant of Robert P. Ingle (individually referred to as a “Qualified Trustee”), or (vi) a beneficiary of a trust described in the immediately preceding clause (v) or, (vii) a trust for the benefit of a beneficiary of a trust described in clause (v) if the trustee of such second trust is a Qualified Trustee, or (viii) any corporation, limited liability company, partnership or other entity that is controlled on the date of transfer by (a) the transferor, (b) an Immediate Family Member of the transferor, or (c) any one or more persons or entities that are each (w) a holder of Class B Common Stock on the date of transfer, or (x) an Immediate Family Member of a holder of Class B Common Stock on the date of transfer, or (z) a descendant of Robert P. Ingle.  For purposes of clause (viii) of the immediately preceding sentence, “control” means (a) the ownership of more than 50% of the voting securities or other voting interest of any entity, or (b) the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such entity, whether through ownership of voting securities, by contract or other agreement, as a general partner, as a manager or otherwise.  Any shares of Class B Common Stock transferred beneficially but not of record may be denied the right to vote and receive payment of dividends until the shares have been transferred of record.  “Immediate Family Member” shall mean a person’s spouse, parents and such parent’s descendants.  Any transfer by a deceased holder’s executor, administrator or personal representative shall be deemed made by the deceased holder.”

CONTENTS

24

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ON EQUAL VOTING RIGHTS FOR EACH SHARE

The following proposal and supporting statement were submitted by a stockholder, the name and stockholdings of which will be furnished promptly to any stockholder upon written or oral request to the Company’s Secretary at the Company’s executive offices, with the intention of presenting it for a vote at the Annual Meeting:

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL

Equal Voting Rights for Each Share

RESOLVED: Shareholders request that our Board take the steps necessary to eventually enable all of our company’s outstanding stock to have an equal one-vote per share in each voting situation. This would encompass all practicable steps including encouragement and negotiation with current and future shareholders, who have more than one vote per share, to request that they relinquish, for the common good of all shareholders, any preexisting rights, if necessary.

This proposal topic may have received majority support from all the non-insider Ingles Markets shares in 2019 and 2021. Dual-class stocks tend to under-perform the stock market.

Dual-class stocks tend to create an inferior class of shareholders and hand over power to a select few, who are then allowed to pass the financial risk onto others. With few constraints placed upon them, managers holding super-class stock can spin out of control. Families and senior managers can entrench themselves into the operations of the company, regardless of their abilities and performance. Dual-class structures may allow management to make bad decisions with few consequences.

Hollinger International presented a sad example of the negative effects of dual-class shares. Former CEO Conrad Black controlled all of the company’s class-B shares, which gave him 30% of the equity and 73% of the voting power. He ran the company as if he were the sole owner, exacting huge management fees, consulting payments and personal dividends. Hollinger’s board of directors was filled with Black’s friends who were unlikely to forcefully oppose his authority.

Holders of publicly traded shares of Hollinger had almost no power to have any influence in terms of executive pay, mergers and acquisitions, board composition or poison pills. Hollinger’s financial and share performance suffered under Black’s control.

The Council for Institutional Investors (CII) recommends a 7-year phase-out of dual class share offerings. The International Corporate Governance Network supports CII’s recommendation to require a time-based sunset clause for dual class shares to revert to a traditional one-share/one-vote structure in no more than 7-years.

Please vote yes:

Equal Voting Rights for Each Share

STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION

The Board has given the stockholder proposal careful consideration and believes that it should not be implemented.

The voting powers, preferences and relative rights of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock are identical in all respects, except that each share of Class A Common Stock is entitled to receive a cash dividend and liquidation payment in an amount equal to 110% of any cash dividend or liquidation payment on Class B Common Stock and the holders of Class A Common Stock have one vote per share and the holders of Class B Common Stock have ten votes per share.

25

The Company has had two classes of common stock since it became a publicly traded company in September 1987, giving Class A shareholders over 34 years to balance the risks and rewards of stock ownership in the Company, including receiving higher dividends versus lesser voting control compared to Class B shareholders. Class A stockholders have received 10% more cash dividends than Class B stockholders for every quarterly cash dividend since becoming a publicly traded company in September 1987.

Over the years, Management’s focus has been to serve the interests of its customers, associates and holders of both Class A and Class B Common Stock, with no preference to one stockholder group over any other.

Robert P. Ingle II has informed the Company that he, in his capacity as a stockholder, intends to vote against the stockholder proposal. Mr. Ingle II controls approximately 71% of the outstanding voting power. If Mr. Ingle II does vote against the proposal, it will not receive a sufficient number of favorable votes to be approved.

26

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING CAGE FREE EGG PROGRESS DISCLOSURE

In the “Animal Welfare” section of its website, Ingles states that “Ingles Markets associates and customers are passionatethe company is “passionate about Animal Welfare” and that the company “is committed to supporting the humane treatment of animals.”

Toward thisthat end, in 2016, Ingles Markets announced in a press release that “Ingles’ goalits “goal is to have 100% of both the shell and liquid eggs it sells come from cage-free hens by 2025.” (Ingles(Despite its passion for animal welfare, Ingles had been permitting its egg suppliers to lock hens in cages so small and cramped, the animals could barely move for their entire lives.)

However, serious concerns have arisen as to what steps and progress—if any—

Come 2022, six years had passed since the company has made toward implementing this policy.

For context, hundredsits pledge and only three were left before its deadline. So, a Humane Society of the world’s largest food companiesUnited States shareholder proposal requested a progress update.

In its statement opposing the proposal, Ingles reiterated the company’s passion for animal welfare and retailerssaid it “believes that the 2025 goal is attainable.” Yet, oddly, it refused to disclose any measurable progress whatsoever.
Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) supported the proposal, concluding, “there is an industry transition taking place towards sale of 100 percent cage-free eggs, and many of the company’s peers have addressed concerns about the extreme, inhumane confinement of laying hens by adopting similar policies to switch to 100% cage-free eggs—including Kroger, Albertsons, Walmart, Target, Costco, Ahold Delhaize and others.

Indeed, the treatment of animals within the supply chain can be viewed as materially impacting food companies:

Northern Trust—a major Ingles shareholder with $1 trillion in assets under management—has reported that it, “generally votes for proposals requesting increased disclosure or reporting regarding animal treatment issues that may impact a company’s operations and products…especially in relation to food production.”

Citigroup concluded that “headline risks” endangering food purveyors include “concerns over animal cruelty.”

Glass Lewis reports: a company “should consider its exposure to regulatory, legal and reputational risk due to its animal welfare policies and practices.”

“In the case of animal welfare,” reported the World Bank’s International Finance Corporation, “failure to keep pace could put companies and their investors at a competitive disadvantage.”

Many leading food companies have alreadyeither reached 100%100 percent cage-free eggs in their supply chains and othersor are disclosing their progress. Just some include Walmart, Sam’s Club, Kroger, Target, Nestle, Unilever, Conagra Brands, KraftHeinz, Campbell Soup, Mondelez, McDonald’s and more.

It would benefit shareholders to understand what progress, if any,continued: “Lack of disclosure on this front puts the company in a laggard position versus its peers. For these reasons, this proposal warrants shareholder support.”

Since then, Ingles has made toward implementingcontinued touting its policy of switchingcage-free egg goal–but still without disclosing any measurable progress.
With its 2025 deadline now even closer, we ask the company to 100% cage-free eggs.

reconsider this secrecy and disclose its progress.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Shareholders request that within six months, Ingles disclose what percentage of its shell and liquid eggs werecome from cage-free at the time it announced its egg policy in 2016, what percentage are cage-free today,animals, the specific steps the companyIngles has taken toward implementing its cage-free egg commitment since first announcing the pledge, and what next steps the company will take to reach its goal of sourcing only cage-free eggs by 2025. These disclosures should be made within three months of the 2022 annual meeting, at reasonable cost, and omit proprietary information.

STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION

The Board has given the stockholder proposal careful consideration and believes that it should not be implemented.

27

The Company and its associates are passionate about animal welfare, and the Company has previously stated its goal to have 100% of both the shell and liquid eggs it sells come from cage-free hens by 2025.  Of all shell and liquid eggs that the Company has sold since setting its cage-free goal in 2016, the Company has increased the percentage of such sales comprising cage free shell and liquid eggs each year, and the Company currently believes that the 2025 goal is attainable. However, the Company believes that reporting periodic progress towards this goal could be misunderstood by certain stakeholders and could place the Company at a competitive disadvantage, which could negatively impact its stockholders.  At the present time, the Company believes that there is an inadequate supply of cage-free eggs at a reasonable cost to meet all of its customer demand with 100% cage free shell and liquid eggs.  The Company continues to work with its suppliers to meet the 2025 goal.

Robert P. Ingle, II has informed the Company that he, in his capacity as a stockholder, intends to vote against thethis stockholder proposal. Mr. Ingle, II controls approximately 71%72% of theour outstanding voting power. If Mr. Ingle, II does votevotes against the proposal, it will not receive a sufficient number of favorable votes to be approved.

2822

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL CONCERNING RISK DISCLOSURE RELATED TO CONSUMER EXPECTATIONS ON SIGNIFICANT POLICY MATTERS
Dear fellow shareholders,
Incredibly, Ingles’ 10-Ks don’t declare any risks from changes in customer trends, tastes, preferences, or shopping patterns (collectively, customer “expectations”) regarding significant policy (or any other) matters – raising serious governance concerns about the Board’s role overseeing how Ingles determines such risks.
And indeed, customer expectations on significant policy issues can pose risks if not adequately addressed.
In its 2022 “Imperative Issues” report, FMI specifically recognizes “rising ESG expectations” as one of “six major issues” impacting retailers. (FMI is the industry’s trade association, and Robert P. Ingle II sits on its Board of Directors and its Public Affairs Committee.)
As Walmart recognizes, failing to “effectively respond to changing consumer tastes, preferences (including those related to ESG issues) and shopping patterns…could negatively affect our reputation and relationship with our customers, the demand for the products we sell or services we offer, our market share and the growth of our business.” (See many more examples at: TABholdings.org/Ingles)
Says Glass Lewis: “Insufficient oversight of material environmental and social issues can present direct legal, financial, regulatory and reputational risks that could serve to harm shareholder interests.”
In fact, even failing to disclose risks can create new risks, which the Board should certainly be closely scrutinizing and vigilantly avoiding.
Moreover, since 2006, Ingles’ 10-Ks have included a dedicated section about “trends” that may continue for the next year – but they don’t say that Ingles’ response (or failure to respond) to values-based expectations can pose risks. And concerningly, Ingles’ 10-K “trends” section only identifies a single such issue: the environment.
Every year since 2008, they’ve reported, using the exact same language, that: “The Company and its customers will continue to become more environmentally aware, evidenced by the Company’s increased recycled waste paper and pallets and customers’ increased usage of reusable shopping bags.”
Of course, if every year since 2008, Ingles and its customers have grown more aware, shareholders could expect Ingles’ language to evolve; yet it’s remained the same.
Similarly, Ingles has had a “Green Initiatives” webpage since 2011 but not one word has changed there either. (And yet in 2019, Ingles suddenly began inserting this old language into its annual proxy statements.)
As for expectations on other prevalent issues – like climate change, human rights, board diversity, or lobbying: Ingles offers little, if anything, in the way of concrete policies addressing them.
While it’s shocking that Ingles doesn’t attribute any risks to any changing customer expectations, we now seek details about how the Board oversees Ingles’ determination and management of those relating to significant policy issues.
THEREFORE, shareholders request that within six months, Ingles publish a report that EITHER explains how and why the company affirmatively concluded it faces no material risks attributable to changing customer expectations on significant environmental and social policy matters OR, if it does not so conclude, discloses an analysis of how the Board is overseeing Ingles’ management of such risks (and any risks from failing to have disclosed the risks).
Contact: IMKTA@TABholdings.org
Robert P. Ingle, II has informed the Company that he, in his capacity as a stockholder, intends to vote against this stockholder proposal. Mr. Ingle, II controls approximately 72% of our outstanding voting power. If Mr. Ingle, II votes against the proposal, it will not receive a sufficient number of favorable votes to be approved.
23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OTHER MATTERS

Solicitation of Proxies

The Company will solicit proxies for the Annual Meeting and will bear the cost of internetInternet availability of documents, voting over the internetInternet and for all other costs associated with assembling, printing, mailing and soliciting proxy solicitation materials. The Company’s officers and regular associates may also solicit proxies in person or by telephone, but they will not be specially compensated for such services. The Company’s regularly retained investor relations firm, Finn Partners, may also solicit proxies by internet,Internet, telephone and mail. The Company will not pay Finn Partners a separate fee for any such proxy solicitations. The Company will reimburse brokerage firms and other nominees, custodians and fiduciaries for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses they incur in forwarding proxy solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of Common Stock held of record by them.

Stockholders’ Proposals for the 20232025 Annual Meeting

The Company plans to hold its 20232025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in February of 2023.2025. Any proposal that a stockholder wants to be presented at the 20232025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by the Secretary no later than September 8, 20226, 2024 or the proposal will automatically be excluded from proxy materials for that meeting. Such proposals must be received by the Secretary at the Company’s principal office, the address of which is set forth in this Proxy Statement, and must meet the requirements of the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission to be eligible to be included in the proxy materials for the Company’s 20232025 Annual Meeting.

In addition, for stockholder nominees for directors to be considered timely for inclusion on a universal proxy card pursuant to Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act, stockholders must provide notice no later than December 15, 2024, containing the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.

Further, any stockholder proposal for which the Company does not receive notice on or before November 22, 202220, 2024 shall be subject to the discretionary vote of the proxy holders at the 20232025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Action on Other Matters at the 20222024 Annual Meeting

If notice of a stockholder proposal that hashad not been submitted to be included in this Proxy Statement was not received by the Company on or before November 12, 2021,21, 2023, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy will have discretionary authority to vote all proxies with respect thereto in accordance with their best judgment.

At this time, the Company does not know of any matters to be presented for action at the 20222024 Annual Meeting other than those listed in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and contained in this Proxy Statement. If any other matter comes before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that the persons who are named in the proxies will vote the shares represented by effective proxies in their discretion.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, the Company is required to identify any Reporting Person (as defined below) thatwho failed to file on a timely basis with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC any report that was required to be filed during fiscal 20212023 with the SEC pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.SEC. Such required filings include a Form 3 (an initial report of beneficial ownership of Common Stock) and a Form 4 and Form 5 (which reflect changes in beneficial ownership of Common Stock). For purposes of this Proxy Statement, a “Reporting Person” is a person who at any time during fiscal year 20212023 was (a) a director of the Company, (b) an executive officer of the Company, or its subsidiaries, or (c) a holder of more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

The Company believes that during fiscal year 2021,2023, its Reporting Persons complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.requirements, except that Ms. Laura Sharp inadvertently failed to timely file a Form 4 reflecting the conversion of 77,700 shares of Class B Common Stock to Class A Common Stock. In making this statement, the Company has relied solely upon an examination of the copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5, and amendments thereto, provided to the Company and the written representations of its Reporting Persons.

Householding
We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, multiple stockholders who share the same last name and address will receive only one copy of the proxy materials. If the household received a printed set of proxy materials by mail, each stockholder will receive his or her own proxy card by mail. We have undertaken householding to reduce our printing costs and postage fees.
2924

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If you wish to opt out of householding and continue to receive multiple copies of the proxy materials at the same address or if you are receiving multiple copies of the proxy materials at the same address and wish to receive a single copy, you may do so by notifying us in writing at Ingles Markets, Incorporated, P.O. Box 6676, Asheville, North Carolina 28816, attn Investor Relations or by telephone at (828) 669-2941, ext. 223. You also may request additional copies of the Notice or proxy materials and 2023 Annual Report by notifying us in writing or by telephone at the same addresses or telephone number, and we undertake to deliver such materials promptly.
Availability of Form 10-K

Upon written request, the Company will provide, without charge, to stockholders that are entitled to receive this Proxy Statement a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 25, 2021,30, 2023, as filed with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC (including the financial statements and related schedules, but not including the exhibits thereto, which will be provided upon written request at the stockholder’s expense). Such Annual Report on Form 10-K is also available from the SEC at its website at https://www.sec.gov and at www.ingles-markets.com,, at Corporate Information, SEC Filings. Requests for copies should be directed to Investor Relations at Ingles Markets, Incorporated, P.O. Box 6676, Asheville, North Carolina 28816, or by telephone at (828) 669-2941, ext. 223.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.



PLEASE VOTE OVER THE INTERNET AS INSTRUCTED IN THESE MATERIALS OR COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN A PROXY CARD AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE.

By Order of the Board of Directors
graphic
Robert P. Ingle, II

Chairman of the Board

3025